पेंशन बहाली मंच उ0प्र0 द्वारा की गई हड़ताल पर मा0 उच्च न्यायालय का निर्णय हुआ अपलोड, आदेश देखें

पेंशन बहाली मंच उ0प्र0 द्वारा की गई हड़ताल पर मा0 उच्च न्यायालय का निर्णय हुआ अपलोड, आदेश देखें
26. In such view of the matter, we are constrained to issue the
following directions:
(i). The strike call declared by the respondent no.5 is
declared illegal. The respondent no.5 and any other
Employees Union of the State Government are prohibited
from resorting to any strike.
(ii) The State Government shall create an Institutional avenue
for discussion and redressal of the grievance of the
employees.
(iii) The grievance redressal mechanism of the State
Government shall be headed by a senior most officer of the
State Government not below the rank of Principal Secretary.
(iv) The State Government shall take disciplinary action as per
the Service Rules against the employees, who have gone on
strike pursuant to the strike call. The progress of the
disciplinary action shall be intimated to the Court by an
Affidavit filed on behalf of State within a period of one month
from today.
(v) The places where the employees are proposing to go on
strike or 'Dharnas' shall be video recorded and the actions,
demonstrations of striking employees shall also be video
recorded.
(vi) The attendance of the employees shall be made
compulsory and it shall be attested on daily basis by a senior
officer of the concerned department.
(vii) The Chief Secretary shall ensure that compliance of these
directions is monitored by the respective heads of
departments.

27. At this stage, it is also pertinent to refer some of the
arguments advanced by Sri Upendra Nath Misra, learned counsel
who has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent no.5.

28. Sri Upendra Nath Misra contends that various demands
relating to grant of pension have not been acceded to by the State
Government. This has forced the hand of the employees. Though
the learned Counsel concedes that the matter relating to pension is

engaging the attention of this Court.