सोनभद्र के पूर्व बीएसए को अवमानना में 15 दिन की कारावास और 2 हजार रुपये जुर्माने की सजा, मृतक आश्रित कोटे से नियुक्ति पाए शिक्षक की वरिष्ठता में मनमानी और कोर्ट के आदेश का पालन न करना बनी वजह

सोनभद्र के पूर्व बीएसए को अवमानना में 15 दिन की कारावास और 2 हजार रुपये जुर्माने की सजा,  मृतक आश्रित कोटे से नियुक्ति पाए शिक्षक की वरिष्ठता में मनमानी और कोर्ट के आदेश का पालन न करना बनी वजह।

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Reserved 

Court No. - 27 

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5738 of 2012 

Applicant :- Diptiman Banarjee 

Opposite Party :- Prabhu Ram Chauhan Basic Shiksha Adhikari 

Counsel for Applicant :- Satya Prakash Shukla,Ajitabh Choubey,Sunil Kumar Singh 

Counsel for Opposite Party :- B R Maurya,Mangla Prasad Rai,S.C. 

Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. 

Working order---

Non-compliance of the order of the writ court dated 22.11.2011 by the opposite party no.1, in view of the facts and circumstances considered above, is deliberate, intentional and has compromised the dignity of the Court. The admission of guilt by the opposite party no.1 to the charge framed by the Court has already been observed hereinabove. He is a contemnor. The repentance, remorse and cringing apology being expressed by the opposite party no.1 is nothing more than a defense. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the conduct of the opposite party no.1, Prabhu Ram Chauhan, it is held that the apology proffered by him is not bona fide or in good faith and hence the apology is rejected. 

Sri V.K.Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.1 on the question of sentence states that the opposite party no.1, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the apology that has been offered by him, may be punished by paying fine only. However, in view of the contumacious conduct of the opposite party no.1 which reveals that the contempt is deliberate and intentional and has compromised the dignity of the Court, mere fine would not suffice. 

In view of the above, the opposite party no.1, Prabhu Ram Chauhan son of late Sri Shiv Nath Ram Chauhan who has been duly identified by his counsel Sri V.K. Tiwari is punished with simple imprisonment for a term of fifteen days and with a fine of Rs. 2000/. In case of failure of payment of fine within a week from today, the Contemnor-opposite party no.1 shall undergo further simple imprisonment of fifteen days. 

The contempt application stands allowed. 

A copy of this order shall be communicated to the Registrar General for communication and compliance. 

Order Date :- 18.4.2019 

sfa/ 

(Jayant Banerji, J) 

Bsa के अनुरोध पर 30 दिन के लिए आदेश स्थगित

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5738 of 2012 

Applicant :- Diptiman Banarjee 

Opposite Party :- Prabhu Ram Chauhan Basic Shiksha Adhikari 

Counsel for Applicant :- Satya Prakash Shukla,Ajitabh Choubey,Sunil Kumar Singh 

Counsel for Opposite Party :- B R Maurya,Mangla Prasad Rai,S.C. 

Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. 

After delivery of judgement, Contemnor prays that sentence imposed by this Court vide judgement of date be suspended to enable him to avail statutory remedy of appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971. 

In the circumstances, I suspend the sentence for a period of 30 days to enable the Contemnor to avail remedy of appeal. In case, the appeal is not filed or if filed but no otherwise order is passed in appeal, the Contemnor shall surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya immediately after 30 days, who would immediately take appropriate steps for serving out sentence by the Contemnor as directed in the judgement of date passed in this contempt application. 

Order Date :- 18.4.2019 

sfa/ 

(Jayant Banerji, J)